- Joined
- Mar 6, 2016
- Messages
- 2,417
- Age
- 27
Private Ryan said:I don't see why it is that different. I imagine anime only viewers would be rather confused if they saw against Vegeta that Goku had trouble withstanding a Kaioken x3, yet against Tullece he withstands a Kaioken x10, but evidently TOEI didn't really care. In fact, the entirety of Movie 3 seems to not care about what had been shown in the anime. Gohan is at 10,000 despite the fact he had not been shown getting his potential unlocked at that point, Piccolo is at 18,000 for some strange reason, and Goku is at 30,000. It really doesn't match up well to any saga. While it is true that TOEI sometimes withholds things that haven't been shown in the anime at that point (such as Gohan being the weakest in M8, despite being the strongest in the Cell Games) it doesn't have to apply to every movie.HUEBR_Tapion said:BUMPPrivate Ryan said:It still shows that they can use things in the movies without explicitly showing them in the anime first. Another example of this is in Movie 3, when Goku uses Kaioken x10 against Tullece, despite the fact that the statement that Goku could use the Kaioken x10 hadn't yet appeared in the anime.
Yeah, but Kaioken is a different matter. It is a technique that had already been shown in the anime several times, so Goku using it on Movie 3 before it was shown on the anime doesn't conflict with my argument, because the technique itself(Kaioken) had already been shown in the anime before. So my theory still stands.
It's because the technique, Kaioken, had already been presented in the anime, whereas the Freeza statement wasn't. I agree Toei fucks up a lot of stuff, and i think this is an undebatable subject to be honest.