- Joined
- Jun 1, 2015
- Messages
- 30,769
- Age
- 29
misandrist?
srs
srs
Not to mention all the mengs getting beat-up in her series for the gags l0l.Captain Cadaver said:Most of her male characters do tend to be either incompetent compared to the female lead or have their negative character traits defined. The only exception is in Inuyasha, and the male characters in that series can be seen more as wish-fulfilment (given that's basically what isekai boil down to).
A case can certainly be made.
But Bulma was also in jokes. No-one was really given preferential treatment in that regard in DragonBall. Rumiko Takahashi always let's the female characters get in the last word and they are never in the wrong end of a comedic situation. The only time I can think of period, was Kikyo & Naraku.Kenshi said:I wouldn't exactly say she's a misandrist given she likes to serialize her manga in shonen and seinen magazines and the majority of her MCs are males, and it's typical in shows with a strong female focus for males to be boke characters anyway. By that logic, Toriyama could be considered misandrist because he made Yamcha an incompetent with a crippling fear of women, Goku an uneducated, naive child who couldn't count properly, and Roshi a complete pervert.
What about the gais always being at the wrong end of a joke or getting beaten-up for jokes? Women empowerment?Kenshi said:About the closest thing Takahashi said to a misandrist comment was when she said she made Jakotsu of the Shichinintai a homosexual so Inuyasha wouldn't have to kill a female iirc. Other than that she doesn't seem to be sexist; most of the powerful villains in Ranma and Inuyasha tend to be males (Herb, that phoenix guy at the end of R1/2, Sesshomaru, Naraku) and most of her main characters are males too.