Although I'm pretty big on discussions pertaining to hypothetical versus and power scaling in general, I'm not one to call something out as bad writing over something as trivial as mild inconsistencies in power, feats, or anything else that may defy what was previously established at one point.
What annoys me is how some fans will resort to farfetched excuses to justify why a particular character isn't as strong as they may appear just because they themselves don't want that character to be at a certain level. A common excuse I often encounter is the whole "so-and-so can't be at such-and-such level because that makes no sense at all" or the whole "if so-and-so is really that strong, how come they weren't there to stop such-and-such?"
I get that a clean, somewhat consistent power scale has some correlation with good storytelling; but these are discussions pertaining to a cartoon where beings with super abilities travel around the universe and challenge planet-busting warriors with magical (ki-based) attacks. Where part about that makes sense in the first place?
Regardless, I feel I'm more often than not I'm able to find an in-universe explanation for many of the excuses listed above anyway; so it really doesn't take away from show's quality as some like to put it.
What's also hilarious is how so many fans seem to have no problem downplaying a character by resorting to some retcon theory that was never once stated to be a thing, without realizing how open ended such a speculation is. Meaning, if some unstated retcon can weaken a character, why wouldn't that same flawed argument be applicable for a character getting stronger?
But all in all, I haven't really encountered this type of downplaying and/or senseless speculating here on this forum. This is the kind of stuff I usually encountered at other places. I'm actually kinda glad I haven't really had to go in circles about the same redundant nonsense pertaining to downplaying over and over again with the members here; makes discussions a whole lot more fun.
Off topic, but has anyone here ever chatted / debated with me on another DB forum?
What annoys me is how some fans will resort to farfetched excuses to justify why a particular character isn't as strong as they may appear just because they themselves don't want that character to be at a certain level. A common excuse I often encounter is the whole "so-and-so can't be at such-and-such level because that makes no sense at all" or the whole "if so-and-so is really that strong, how come they weren't there to stop such-and-such?"
I get that a clean, somewhat consistent power scale has some correlation with good storytelling; but these are discussions pertaining to a cartoon where beings with super abilities travel around the universe and challenge planet-busting warriors with magical (ki-based) attacks. Where part about that makes sense in the first place?
Regardless, I feel I'm more often than not I'm able to find an in-universe explanation for many of the excuses listed above anyway; so it really doesn't take away from show's quality as some like to put it.
What's also hilarious is how so many fans seem to have no problem downplaying a character by resorting to some retcon theory that was never once stated to be a thing, without realizing how open ended such a speculation is. Meaning, if some unstated retcon can weaken a character, why wouldn't that same flawed argument be applicable for a character getting stronger?
But all in all, I haven't really encountered this type of downplaying and/or senseless speculating here on this forum. This is the kind of stuff I usually encountered at other places. I'm actually kinda glad I haven't really had to go in circles about the same redundant nonsense pertaining to downplaying over and over again with the members here; makes discussions a whole lot more fun.
Off topic, but has anyone here ever chatted / debated with me on another DB forum?