- Joined
- Jun 3, 2015
- Messages
- 376
[No message]
Killing and fighting would likely be two different scenarios. As expressed in the thread already, Gohan's power at the Budokai was not his full power. The burst of power that Gohan used to kill Cell was higher than the one who was fighting Cell before his power up as expressed by Goku. This same power which Goku claims the current Gohan would beat anybody with, the same power which the Daizenshuu says is equal to Gohan's power when he killed Cell back at the Cell Games which correlates well with Goku's statement that Gohan being angry would surpass himself. Vegeta's comment mainly has to do with how Gohan's current power is far off from when he killed Cell from lack of training and his inability to increase his power by anger.Kyo said:@Dioxide: I don't believe the wording is too significant in this case. If Gohan's power while actually killing Cell is an incredibly high level that he can evidently only achieve when angry (or whatever you believe the reason may have been at the time), then why would Vegeta find it pathetic that Gohan's more casual transformation at the Budokai fails to match up to this level? It's to be expected that it wouldn't.
This is no real issue for me because I don't believe that the Gohan who fought Cell and the Gohan that killed Cell are all that different, but how would you explain it?
I feel you are putting too much stress on the situation which is only meant to convey that Gohan is not as strong as before. Vegeta can't predict exactly how much power Gohan could have lost from not training. Him noting that he isn't as powerful does not have to come from any dissappontment, since his facial expression does not indicate as such nor does he ever state Gohan is pathetic like you are making it out to be, but could from something that crossed his mind and decided to speak out on it to Kaioshin since he expressed earlier that they were after Gohan's energy and Kaioshin replies to him that even so, it is still magnificent energy.Kyo said:I fully understand all your points already. You didn't really answer my question. Yes, Vegeta's comment has to do with how Gohan's power is far off from when he killed Cell, according to you. But why would he find this noteworthy or disappointing? Why would he he find it pathetic that a casual transformation not brought about by anger failed to match this angry, unbeatable Gohan? Such a thing is to be expected, especially since he had already noted prior to that that Gohan had been slacking off.
I have an explanation for myself. The two incarnations of Gohan just aren't all that different if at all, so I don't have to deal with this angry unstoppable Gohan. What's your explanation?
Also, since you want to argue semantics, how do you respond to FP's counterpoint? What does Vegeta mean by "back then"? There's no distinction made there.
It may be a given, but it doesn't mean Vegeta can't reference that to Kaioshin to tell him Gohan was more powerful before.Kyo said:I agree that the degree to which Gohan had weakened wasn't known yet, but that's because I don't see eye to eye with you on Gohan killing Cell. You believe that Vegeta is referring to "unstoppable Gohan" (he must be, as he said "killed," otherwise the differentiation doesn't necessarily mean much), then don't you think that it's already a given that Gohan is far weaker than that, having not trained?
About Vegeta's attitude on the ship, fair enough, I didn't consider that. Two things though: I still hold that Vegeta's demeanor towards Gohan at the Budokai wasn't entirely neutral – at the very least, it was unexpected – and secondly, Goku agrees with Vegeta after he calls Gohan pathetic (though he's not as mean), which leads me to believe that Vegeta's words, regardless of his intentions in saying them, aren't unwarranted by any means.
You'd think that, if Vegeta really is making a distinction between the Gohan that fought and the Gohan that killed, he would only bother to do so if the comparison between the current Gohan and CG Gohan (while calm) wasn't worth noting (i.e. they're comparable in power), yet Gohan's power comes as a surprise to him nonetheless. Moreover, Goku agrees with the idea that Gohan is "pathetic," and he is aware that Gohan hadn't trained, as Vegeta had told him prior to the Dabra fight that Gohan hadn't trained, yet he attributes it to Gohan having "really slacked off!" instead of not being angry, given that even back at the CG, Gohan couldn't achieve such a power without being angry.
Sorry if it looks like I'm harping way too much on one point, I've never been great at being brief.
As for your last point – that's right, and that would be the contradiction like I said. By the same token, I could say that Piccolo saying "fought" doesn't have to signify anything due to the fact that Vegeta merely said "back then"? You say Vegeta's statement is vague, though I don't see it as any different from other all-encompassing statements made in the past about a character that would logically refer to said character at his/her best (like Kaioshin's "I could kill Freeza" or something), thus they're contradictory in my eyes if I'm to follow your interpretation of the word "fought." Though I suppose whether or not Vegeta's statement is vague or absolute is up in the air as well.