Search results

Not with Brazillian ones, I'm sure.

"Guy is alright". Man, the matter is much more complex than you think. You can't summarize him with these words lol. You didn't even know him before. US started blocking Cuba in the Eisenhower, actually. The former Baptista dictator was backed by the States, but the subsequent ruler was a...

Actually, Brazil managed to get many ppl out of poverty with the Lula government, and this neo-liberalism agenda the current government is pushing isn't friendly at all to poor ppl and minorities. I haven't ignored your answer at all. US blocked Cuba because it wasn't within their "parameters...

Like I said, I'll watch eventually. I'm just not in the mood for Ben Shapiro now. If you wish, I can address you some good videos that gives a different perspective on communism, too.

Again, why the need for the blockades against Cuba? If Socialism is so failing, why not let it collapse on their own?

And the US actually harm Cuba with their blockades, not support them lmao

In Brazil, another 19 million are in an even more delicate food situation. We have almost 130 million people suffering from hunger, more than half of our population, proportionately larger than Cuba and ten times more than Cuba

They still made a vaccine of their own and it seems it's one of the countries that handled well covid.

Most studies acnoweldge the blockades Cuba suffers from the USA as meaning their shortages in certain field. Yet the famine problem only aggravated due to covid, with the lack of tourism profit.

So there goes your whole BS

The medicine there is highly developed. So much so the developed a vaccine of their own. Capitalists countries like Brazil couldn't even dream.

The food there isn't diversified and ppl there eat more of the same, but there isn't ppl dying from starving there.

Cuba is having hardships because of the US' blockades. To deny that is being disingenuous. I've been to Cuba. I can't know everything there, but there is no children starving, and while there's some hardships (mainly associated to lack of hygiene), they get by way better than many poor...

And you didn't answer my question.

And illiterate children, either.

Cuba is also a socialist country and despite all its problems due to the US' blackades, it doesn't suffer from millions of kids starving.

These other poor aforementioned countries were colonized (and not colonizers) and running a capitalist system like that will undoubtedly lead to way more inequality.

You mentioned the scandinava countries, but what about Peru? What about Bolivia? Those are capitalist countries as well and many label them as "shit holes". The difference is that those Scandinavia countries were mainly colonizers, and had room to structure themselves