- Joined
- May 31, 2015
- Messages
- 27,967
So, upon revisiting the section of the manga focusing on the Genki-Dama and coming across an interesting video discussing DB's writing style for character focus, it got me thinking about the most common fan complaint for the Boo Arc - Goku becoming the main character ruining the themes of the arc and the Cell Arc's ending; as well as the question of how much validity it holds.
Now, Goku being brought back to defeat Boo and save the day would indeed ruin the themes of what came before...if that were strictly the case. One clear bit of dialogue that tends to fly over most people's minds on the subject tends to be Vegeta bringing up the idea of using the Genki-Dama when talking about how many times Goku has saved the Earth and how "it's time for the people of Earth to save themselves for a change."
That is perhaps the most important statement when it comes to the framing of the Boo Arc's climax as it's not just Goku being the one to kill Boo as it's instead the biggest team effort since the battle with Vegeta, if not arguably a contender for biggest team effort in the series. Vegeta and Good Boo distract Pure Boo whilst Goku gathers Genki from everyone on Earth and in Otherworld with a lot of help from Mr. Satan and wouldn't have been able to accomplish this nor win had it not been for Kibitoshin transporting Dende to Namek where the latter and his fellow Namekians used the Dragon Balls to give Goku the opportunity to defeat Boo. This is made even more apparent by Goku's attitude in wanting Boo to be reincarnated and, later, to fight Oob. Goku spells it out clearly that he wanted a one-on-one match with Boo/Oob and the reason for that is pretty obvious - he couldn't beat Boo by his own power and had to rely on everyone's efforts to finally do so. This is pretty consistent with Goku's character as well, given his main reason for sparing Vegeta. Also, from a purely utilitarian perspective, Goku being the only user of the Genki-Dama, an attack that can easily be made large enough to completely envelop Boo, made him being the one chosen to eliminate Boo the most logical decision from an in-universe perspective and general consistent writing with how broken Boo's regeneration was. That said, Goku didn't defeat Boo (at least not in the more standard sense that he had with past main villains such as Piccolo Daimao or Freeza) and the Genki-Dama being the choice Toriyama went with made a lot of sense.
Hell, you could even argue that Gotenks and Gohan's roles in the battle contributed towards this eventuality more so than the support cast did against a lot of past antagonists. Without them failing to kill Boo through decisions that were consistent with their character, they wouldn't have been absorbed and lead to the climax we got. Yes, Gohan defeating Boo would be satisfying, but there wouldn't be much more to it than reaffirmation of what was established in the Cell Arc, compared to the idea of everyone pitching in for the Genki-Dama providing the idea that the battle with Boo brought so much of the series together (even if a lot of it was just cameos). I'd argue that what Gotenks and Gohan accomplished towards the eventual endgame with Boo was a lot more than against many of the manga's past main villains. Roshi and Chaozu's sacrifices against Piccolo Daimao ended up meaning nothing and the support cast on Namek's efforts against Freeza's lower forms were made meaningless each time he transformed; with even Piccolo's distraction for the Genki-Dama proving pointless when Freeza lost no stamina or Ki from it (seeing as how his stamina drain at 100% wasn't suggested to be purely due to his damage).
Also, even if not entirely convinced about these points mitigating the themes of the next generation, which is a fair point, it's worth noting the kind of writing style DB has. From the beginning, Dragon Ball has always been the story of Goku with the first arc's ensemble feel being the only time that's debatable. In stories particularly focused on a single protagonist rather than an ensemble cast, it makes sense for the protagonist to be the centre of attention throughout its run. Yes, Gohan became the main focus at several points, but those were times where Goku was either dead or otherwise unable to be the one driving the plot. Toriyama's statements about Gohan not being someone who could carry the story have some truth to it as, whilst Gohan is a decent enough character that a story about him would be interesting, his focus on more grounded aspects of life and society would have made a DB story centred on him somewhat dissonant in its focus compared to what Dragon Ball had been up to that point and the only way to avoid that would be to throw in so many battles that it'd distract the audience and characters from any sense of personal character motivation. The only other option for a protagonist in order for the series to keep the same atmosphere would've been Vegeta, at which point you've already abandoned the next generation theme and may as well bring Goku back due to their dynamic and comparison. Making Gohan or Oob the main character would work, provided it was a sequel. For the original manga, however, it makes sense for a story that has covered and centred around Goku's life to start and end with him.
There is still the hanging question of the next generation, but that theme is something Goku addressed just prior to fighting Pure Boo - he gave the young generation their chance and they blew it. As I said before, the next generation succeeding would've just resulted in reaffirmation of what the Cell Arc did and offer nothing new thematically. If anything, there is more to take away from the idea that sometimes the older generation need to pitch in for problems they left in the younger generation's hands and that everyone needs to play their part in getting through a difficult situation.
It may have been different if Boo as a villain had offered something that would give Gotenks or Gohan extra agency compared to Goku. Yes, Boo killed their families and friends....who are also Goku's friends and family. The only character with any additional level of agency in defeating Boo would've been Shin, and I don't need to explain how jarring it'd have been for Kibitoshin to be the one to obliterate Boo.
All that said, what are your thoughts? Would you still have ended the Boo Arc differently? Have I offered a new light for you to view Toriyama's decision in?
....Discuss...XD
Now, Goku being brought back to defeat Boo and save the day would indeed ruin the themes of what came before...if that were strictly the case. One clear bit of dialogue that tends to fly over most people's minds on the subject tends to be Vegeta bringing up the idea of using the Genki-Dama when talking about how many times Goku has saved the Earth and how "it's time for the people of Earth to save themselves for a change."
That is perhaps the most important statement when it comes to the framing of the Boo Arc's climax as it's not just Goku being the one to kill Boo as it's instead the biggest team effort since the battle with Vegeta, if not arguably a contender for biggest team effort in the series. Vegeta and Good Boo distract Pure Boo whilst Goku gathers Genki from everyone on Earth and in Otherworld with a lot of help from Mr. Satan and wouldn't have been able to accomplish this nor win had it not been for Kibitoshin transporting Dende to Namek where the latter and his fellow Namekians used the Dragon Balls to give Goku the opportunity to defeat Boo. This is made even more apparent by Goku's attitude in wanting Boo to be reincarnated and, later, to fight Oob. Goku spells it out clearly that he wanted a one-on-one match with Boo/Oob and the reason for that is pretty obvious - he couldn't beat Boo by his own power and had to rely on everyone's efforts to finally do so. This is pretty consistent with Goku's character as well, given his main reason for sparing Vegeta. Also, from a purely utilitarian perspective, Goku being the only user of the Genki-Dama, an attack that can easily be made large enough to completely envelop Boo, made him being the one chosen to eliminate Boo the most logical decision from an in-universe perspective and general consistent writing with how broken Boo's regeneration was. That said, Goku didn't defeat Boo (at least not in the more standard sense that he had with past main villains such as Piccolo Daimao or Freeza) and the Genki-Dama being the choice Toriyama went with made a lot of sense.
Hell, you could even argue that Gotenks and Gohan's roles in the battle contributed towards this eventuality more so than the support cast did against a lot of past antagonists. Without them failing to kill Boo through decisions that were consistent with their character, they wouldn't have been absorbed and lead to the climax we got. Yes, Gohan defeating Boo would be satisfying, but there wouldn't be much more to it than reaffirmation of what was established in the Cell Arc, compared to the idea of everyone pitching in for the Genki-Dama providing the idea that the battle with Boo brought so much of the series together (even if a lot of it was just cameos). I'd argue that what Gotenks and Gohan accomplished towards the eventual endgame with Boo was a lot more than against many of the manga's past main villains. Roshi and Chaozu's sacrifices against Piccolo Daimao ended up meaning nothing and the support cast on Namek's efforts against Freeza's lower forms were made meaningless each time he transformed; with even Piccolo's distraction for the Genki-Dama proving pointless when Freeza lost no stamina or Ki from it (seeing as how his stamina drain at 100% wasn't suggested to be purely due to his damage).
Also, even if not entirely convinced about these points mitigating the themes of the next generation, which is a fair point, it's worth noting the kind of writing style DB has. From the beginning, Dragon Ball has always been the story of Goku with the first arc's ensemble feel being the only time that's debatable. In stories particularly focused on a single protagonist rather than an ensemble cast, it makes sense for the protagonist to be the centre of attention throughout its run. Yes, Gohan became the main focus at several points, but those were times where Goku was either dead or otherwise unable to be the one driving the plot. Toriyama's statements about Gohan not being someone who could carry the story have some truth to it as, whilst Gohan is a decent enough character that a story about him would be interesting, his focus on more grounded aspects of life and society would have made a DB story centred on him somewhat dissonant in its focus compared to what Dragon Ball had been up to that point and the only way to avoid that would be to throw in so many battles that it'd distract the audience and characters from any sense of personal character motivation. The only other option for a protagonist in order for the series to keep the same atmosphere would've been Vegeta, at which point you've already abandoned the next generation theme and may as well bring Goku back due to their dynamic and comparison. Making Gohan or Oob the main character would work, provided it was a sequel. For the original manga, however, it makes sense for a story that has covered and centred around Goku's life to start and end with him.
There is still the hanging question of the next generation, but that theme is something Goku addressed just prior to fighting Pure Boo - he gave the young generation their chance and they blew it. As I said before, the next generation succeeding would've just resulted in reaffirmation of what the Cell Arc did and offer nothing new thematically. If anything, there is more to take away from the idea that sometimes the older generation need to pitch in for problems they left in the younger generation's hands and that everyone needs to play their part in getting through a difficult situation.
It may have been different if Boo as a villain had offered something that would give Gotenks or Gohan extra agency compared to Goku. Yes, Boo killed their families and friends....who are also Goku's friends and family. The only character with any additional level of agency in defeating Boo would've been Shin, and I don't need to explain how jarring it'd have been for Kibitoshin to be the one to obliterate Boo.
All that said, what are your thoughts? Would you still have ended the Boo Arc differently? Have I offered a new light for you to view Toriyama's decision in?
....Discuss...XD