supersaiyangodgogeta said:
The only thing you've done is force me to wall post which isn't necessary because you aren't even saying anything.
So I'm just going to summarize your posts since you have no actual point.
Goku at full power is stated to be equal to Frieza by toei. He isn't as strong as a hakaishin just because of kaioken. That's just a technique. His full power is equal to golden Frieza.
Beerus beating vegeta doesn't contradict Ivan. That's not how it's presented in the story and that interpretation is nonsense since beerus acknowledged that vegeta could be a god candidate. That's your assumption. As was already stated, ssjg Goku and Toppo are on that level, but aren't as strong as the hakaishin. Period, end of discussion.
Just another case of "this contradicts this because I said so".
The kaioken point is just denial of the obvious considering beerus' and Whis' interaction with Whis asking him if he thinks he's in trouble and beerus tries to play it off while stuttering and sweating. So beerus is in trouble against even the basic x2 kaioken and no future incident states that beerus>kaioken in power. Beerus' smug remarks are before goku masters kaioken to a point where it's drawbacks wouldn't hinder him against beerus, drawbacks that both Champa and Vados remarked on, so once again it's moot.
There's no question if jiren is stronger than beerus. It's obvious if you've been following the story. Beerus wondered how 1 person could have the level of power that a heavily suppressed jiren displayed. Logically that means that he himself isn't that strong otherwise that amount of energy wouldn't be foreign to him. It's common sense. It doesn't matter if both have reached the "hakaishin state". Jiren is drastically farther up the "hakaishin tier" than beerus. Nowhere is it stated that Jirens power is what it takes to reach hakaishin level. You need hakaishin tier power to beat kaioken Goku in power. Jiren is someone on the hakaishin tier that can do this. Doesn't mean that everyone on the hakaishin tier can beat kaioken Goku.
You have posted zero evidence. Your argument is literally "jiren is hakaishin tier. Beerus is hakaishin tier, thus they're comparable. Jiren easily beat kaioken Goku, therefore beerus can."
Nonsense, absolute nonsense that isn't supported by the story.
As I thought, still no solid evidence for Goku Blue (Kaioken) > Beerus. With that wall of text, you couldn't even find a quote stating it. Disappointing.
"You have posted zero evidence". Do you even know what evidence means ? You haven't even posted a single quote yourself, not so much of a link.
Episode: 110
Time: 04:58-05:36
Context: The U7 Gods thinks that Goku has reach his limit and amazed by Jiren's power
Whis: "It appears he's at the limit of his limit. Meanwhile, Jiren appears to be far from full power."
Supreme Kai: "This power feels different from anyone we've ever faced before. He's strong. Plain and simple."
Whis: "I daresay... like a God of Destruction. He is the one who has reached that state. Perhaps even surpassed it. "There is a universe where lives a mortal even a God of Destruction can't defeat." It appears the rumor is true."
1)Goku is at the limit of the limit = his absolute full power.
2)Jiren is far from full power = self-explanatory.
Jiren (holding back) >>> Goku KKx20
3)This power feels different from anyone we've faced before = Jiren is on a completely different league from everyone else (knowing Beerus never used his full power).
4)"He is strong plain and simple" "I daresay...like a God of Destruction" = He is strong like a God of Destruction, but at this point, we don't know if it's the current ones.
Jiren (estimated full power) > Jiren (holding back) >>> Goku KKx20.
4)He is the one who has reached that state ("strong like a god of destruction" state). = He is the first mortal to reach this level of power. The Kaioken being a technique is irrelevant in the fact that Goku isn't stated to reach this level. The Ultra Instinct is a technique too, they do take it into account for Goku's power. The Kaioken raises his power, beyond the limit of his body, but it raises it. So not taking it into account a technique that Goku can use for the sake of it being a technique is simply stupid.
Jiren (estimated full power) > Jiren (holding back) >>> Goku KKx20
5)Perhaps even surpassed it ("the strong like a god of destruction" state) = Self-explanatory, while looking at Vermoud (one of the current God of Destruction). So Whis was actually comparing Jiren to the current God of Destructions (which obviously include Beerus). This means that Jiren's estimated full power is either equal or stronger than the God of Destructions (Beerus...). In eithet case, if Whis even hesitates about putting Jiren equal or above the likes of Beerus when he saw Goku getting stomped, it's pretty obvious that Goku is no match for Beerus.
Jiren (estimated full power) >= Beerus > Jiren (holding back) >>> Goku KKx20
6)There is a universe where lives a mortal even a God of Destruction can't defeat. = Perhaps Jiren can't be defeated by a God of Destruction.
7)It appears the rumor is true ("that a mortal can't be defeated by a God of Destruction) = a mortal who can defeat a god of destruction was treated as a rumor that even Whis didn't thought was true until he saw it. Pretty strange if Goku could defeat Beerus, right ? The limitations of the Kaioken are irrelevant too, as Goku can power up to 2 with zero damage on his body. Besides, if he raises his power to 10 or 20, Beerus would become one-shot material if he was weaker than just the basic one. Proved by Whis and Vados casually one-shotting Champa and Beerus in the manga despite being only 1.5x stronger, considering you follow the BoG scale. That would make:
Goku SSJG = 6
Beerus = 10
Goku Blue (Kaioken) = Over 12 (perhaps stronger than Whis).
Whis = 15
Goku Blue (Kaioken x10) = Over 60
Goku Blue (Kaioken x20) = Over 120
Yeah, definitely one-shot material if I follow your reasoning. Thankfully, I don't.
Jiren (estimated full power) >= Beerus > Jiren (holding back) >>> Goku KKx20.
This time, you can't even claim I twisted any statement (which would involve changing their meaning), as I've simply further emphasized what they meant.
I leave the debate for real now.