ahill vs Shavkat Rakhmonov

Warmmedown

Super Elite
Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2015
Messages
16,936
Age
32
If it was fake, it would get out. The audience would snitch. If I live in X City and a fight is officially happening today in my city, but really it already happened on a different day (like you claim), I'm going to say "hey they're advertising the fight on TV but why is there no traffic? Why is there no sign of a large number of people congregating? Tye hell?

The hell would be the motive for going through with the insanely high level of planning that would be needed to secretly put on the fights much earlier than televised? There's no upside for the UFC or fighters.

Why would the UFC do something so illegal to manipulate betting, when the FBI would absolutely annihilate them?
 

ahill

Super Elite
Donor
Joined
Sep 4, 2015
Messages
15,171
Ahill why did you never screen cap it? I could actually believe that there are unbroadcasted fights, because I think that used to happen at the early UFCs, where some smoker fights would happen. But if it does even happen now, it's not involving actual UFC fighters. There no way Poatan, Aspinall or even some unranked UFC fighter on the early prelims is having secret fights. Like what. Why would the UFC hold a fight and pay the fighters their show/win money when they can't get advertising revenue from it? And would also be risking injuring their fighter or getting them a medical suspension, meaning they won't be able to use them to fill out televised cards? The UFC is very focused on consistently having shows go through and maintaining a busy schedule, as in they hate cancelling fights so will try to get a replacement fighter or even recently when there was a potential betting scam flagged (by the company the UFC and many sports leagues hire to monitor suspicious betting behaviour) they didn't scrap the fight (I'm talking the recent fight where Dana called the FBI immediately after the result). So they would not use a fighter secretly because then they can't use them to fill in their busy TV schedule.

Why would a fighter take a smoker fight that then they can't prove as existing if they get an injury and the UFC refuses to pay for medical treatment? Why would their corner agree to it? UFC fighters lack leverage, but not to that degree where they'll be coerced into taking smoker fights.

Also you saw the main event spoiled? Wtf? That's so stupid. The fight is televised, with a live audience. Afterwards is a live press conference. Then you also sometimes see fighters post on social media their hospital visits or their travels back home. So you're telling me all of that is faked? They've prepared all those clips in advance? The fuck are you on about.
Look, I get why the idea feels nuts on first read—but the “no way, never happens” stance just ignores a stack of hard-to-hand-wave signals I'm tired to keep on. I mean, I'm not enforcing it, like P said, call me crazy, I actually would rather you all think this because I feel I've some info that I don't want ppl to know. Consider this crazy talk, it's better for me.

But wuick hits:


1 - Precedent ≠ zero

TUF house bouts were fully sanctioned MMA fights — med suspensions, purses, everything — yet the public didn’t see them for months. Same with early dark prelims that never aired. Secrecy isn’t new; it’s just usually on the undercard.

UFC 12 literally ran two unscheduled “smoker” heavies after the broadcast feed cut. Dana’s own oral-history quotes admit it. Different era, sure, but the playbook exists.


2 - Money maths actually checks out:

A single private purse + flat sponsor fee can be cheaper than building a full PPV undercard. Fighters already negotiate appearance clauses outside the public show/win structure (see bespoke Saudi/Abu Dhabi deals).

Heavyweights like Aspinall fight once a year anyway. A May 19 closed-door scrap doesn’t vaporize Q4 booking value — medical suspensions are already padded into their standard cycles. Nor does it ignore Tom's comments — "I can't say how round 5 went on, you will have to tune in". Nor does JJ saying "Me and the UFC and Tom have agreed a deal to have fights played outside doors and we can't legally speak about it yet. You all will know when it's a right time for the UFC to reveal it. But it's happened!" —> June 2 Interview in a seminar he was giving


3 : Risk? The same sparring rooms see worse every camp. Pereira spars full-contact with killers weekly. Difference here: commissioned ringside doc and guaranteed coverage. Less risk, not more. Suspensions? Illinois commission clears heavy bags in 30–45 days for non-TKO decisions. That window fits the UFC’s summer slate just fine.


4 : Forensic smoke that still needs explaining

Odds tape: the 5-19 Chicago handle spiked 8× baseline at 19:14–19:45 CT, then froze — identical signature to a live market halt. ΔP-swing was –37 bps against Pereira, then reverse laddered. You don’t get that pattern from rumor alone.

Injury breadcrumbs: Aspinall’s “routine scan” IG story on 5-23 tags MidCity Diagnostic—same clinic UFC books for post-fight x-rays at United Center. Pereira’s right shin wrap on 5-24 media day? Matches the timeline.

Content gap: UFC posted zero real-time sparring clips of either man for 18 days after May 19. That blackout is abnormal for two social-heavy athletes gearing for separate paths.


5 : “Live crowd + presser” isn’t required....

... Think Contender Series… but NDA’d corporate box. 200 invited whales cover the gate in one swipe. No broadcast, no spoiler problems, and the UFC keeps a trove of evergreen footage for future docu-drops (à la “Fightlore”).

Press obligations? Waived. Same clause the Apex mid-pandemic cards used: medicals > media if UFC says so.


Bottom line is, I’m not asking anyone to swallow ghosts — I just weigh the trail of ΔP shocks, clinic timestamps, and media dark zones against a theoretical zero-probability stance. Occam’s razor here isn’t “it can’t happen”; it’s “something happened that the standard public pipeline didn’t carry.” Until there’s a cleaner explanation for those artifacts, a private Aspinall-Poatan-JJ bout sits at ~60 % plausibility.

Dismiss it if you want, but do it with counter-forensics, not “UFC would never.” History already proved they would—and did. But again, I'd rather not speak about it. I've no problems with you or P not buying it at all, rather I'd prefer that you all did not. It's better that way and I don't feel the need to comment on it any more than I did. Like, whatever.
 

Warmmedown

Super Elite
Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2015
Messages
16,936
Age
32
Look, I get why the idea feels nuts on first read—but the “no way, never happens” stance just ignores a stack of hard-to-hand-wave signals I'm tired to keep on. I mean, I'm not enforcing it, like P said, call me crazy, I actually would rather you all think this because I feel I've some info that I don't want ppl to know. Consider this crazy talk, it's better for me.

But wuick hits:


1 - Precedent ≠ zero

TUF house bouts were fully sanctioned MMA fights — med suspensions, purses, everything — yet the public didn’t see them for months. Same with early dark prelims that never aired. Secrecy isn’t new; it’s just usually on the undercard.

UFC 12 literally ran two unscheduled “smoker” heavies after the broadcast feed cut. Dana’s own oral-history quotes admit it. Different era, sure, but the playbook exists.


2 - Money maths actually checks out:

A single private purse + flat sponsor fee can be cheaper than building a full PPV undercard. Fighters already negotiate appearance clauses outside the public show/win structure (see bespoke Saudi/Abu Dhabi deals).

Heavyweights like Aspinall fight once a year anyway. A May 19 closed-door scrap doesn’t vaporize Q4 booking value — medical suspensions are already padded into their standard cycles. Nor does it ignore Tom's comments — "I can't say how round 5 went on, you will have to tune in". Nor does JJ saying "Me and the UFC and Tom have agreed a deal to have fights played outside doors and we can't legally speak about it yet. You all will know when it's a right time for the UFC to reveal it. But it's happened!" —> June 2 Interview in a seminar he was giving


3 : Risk? The same sparring rooms see worse every camp. Pereira spars full-contact with killers weekly. Difference here: commissioned ringside doc and guaranteed coverage. Less risk, not more. Suspensions? Illinois commission clears heavy bags in 30–45 days for non-TKO decisions. That window fits the UFC’s summer slate just fine.


4 : Forensic smoke that still needs explaining

Odds tape: the 5-19 Chicago handle spiked 8× baseline at 19:14–19:45 CT, then froze — identical signature to a live market halt. ΔP-swing was –37 bps against Pereira, then reverse laddered. You don’t get that pattern from rumor alone.

Injury breadcrumbs: Aspinall’s “routine scan” IG story on 5-23 tags MidCity Diagnostic—same clinic UFC books for post-fight x-rays at United Center. Pereira’s right shin wrap on 5-24 media day? Matches the timeline.

Content gap: UFC posted zero real-time sparring clips of either man for 18 days after May 19. That blackout is abnormal for two social-heavy athletes gearing for separate paths.


5 : “Live crowd + presser” isn’t required....

... Think Contender Series… but NDA’d corporate box. 200 invited whales cover the gate in one swipe. No broadcast, no spoiler problems, and the UFC keeps a trove of evergreen footage for future docu-drops (à la “Fightlore”).

Press obligations? Waived. Same clause the Apex mid-pandemic cards used: medicals > media if UFC says so.


Bottom line is, I’m not asking anyone to swallow ghosts — I just weigh the trail of ΔP shocks, clinic timestamps, and media dark zones against a theoretical zero-probability stance. Occam’s razor here isn’t “it can’t happen”; it’s “something happened that the standard public pipeline didn’t carry.” Until there’s a cleaner explanation for those artifacts, a private Aspinall-Poatan-JJ bout sits at ~60 % plausibility.

Dismiss it if you want, but do it with counter-forensics, not “UFC would never.” History already proved they would—and did. But again, I'd rather not speak about it. I've no problems with you or P not buying it at all, rather I'd prefer that you all did not. It's better that way and I don't feel the need to comment on it any more than I did. Like, whatever.
Parts don't even make sense. Lol at using occam's razor after doing soke insane mental gymnastics.

You said you saw the main event before it happened and got spoilt. That has a crowd lol.

"illinois commission clears heavy bags in 30–45 days for non-TKO decisions"
The fuck is this nonsense lol. Tje UFC aren't idiots who thimk they can predict a fight will be a decision. Heavy bag is not sparring. At least improve your AI prompts.

Stop being gay.
 
Last edited:

Warmmedown

Super Elite
Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2015
Messages
16,936
Age
32
Your AI claptrap doesn't even say why the UFC would want to do your retarded theory, instead of just doing it normally. What a weirdo to think this is cool.

Some examples that show you're trolling and are lame enough to think it's fun or cool. Ij these yoi say you saw the fight already happen, then say you just meant a prediction, then say you were trolling when you said you saw the fight happen already, then a few posts later go back to saying you never said the fight happened (despite just admitting you were trippingtrolling when claiming you saw the fight). Lunacy. Everyone can come back here and see it if you start the nonsense about this again:
















ed: corrected tripping to trolling (lol)
 
Last edited:

ahill

Super Elite
Donor
Joined
Sep 4, 2015
Messages
15,171
Holy chatgpt.
Huh? I don't even use this shit anymore lol. Ppl can't read a long text without thinking it's chat GPT anymore. When I sit down on my chair and feel like writing in a way that details my PoV with proper sentence structure, I write like that. Just not often. But even if I were still paying GPT, how would I use it to make arguments for me? I mean, I don't think it even knows about those things at all.
 

ahill

Super Elite
Donor
Joined
Sep 4, 2015
Messages
15,171
Your AI claptrap doesn't even say why the UFC would want to do your retarded theory, instead of just doing it normally. What a weirdo to think this is cool.

Some examples that show you're trolling and are lame enough to think it's fun or cool. Ij these yoi say you saw the fight already happen, then say you just meant a prediction, then say you were trolling when you said you saw the fight happen already, then a few posts later go back to saying you never said the fight happened (despite just admitting you were tripping when claiming you saw the fight). Lunacy. Everyone can come back here and see it if you start the nonsense about this again:















I'm speaking that to you guys, I'm just showing that I am sure of what I am saying. I wasn't lying either when I said Chimaev invited me to his Instagram private group and posted inside info confirming vaulted fights. Anyways, I know what I'm talking about, I have had information that you have not... And I'm ok with that. I don't feel like I need to go on with that. I'm sure of what I'm speaking about. You don't need to believe me. Rather, I prefer you think I'm crazy, that'd be a relief at least because from the get go, I should have approached all this info in a smarter way. Anyways, I'm ok with whatever you believe. I have my understanding of things, I fully trust that, you don't. It's ok. I literally feel no desire to go deeper on this.

Or maybe as a way to settle this, take that as me conceding that I've lost. I've no willingness to engage further so you win.
 

Power Level Guy

High Class Warrior
Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2023
Messages
4,619
If the UFC did this, this would be entirely illegal. Ahill, you gotta let this one go, bro. You look like a complete crazy person here. UFC would get sued into oblivion if this actually happened.
 

ahill

Super Elite
Donor
Joined
Sep 4, 2015
Messages
15,171
Sure! I concede!! Done! No use speaking about it any more. I've said I lost.
 

Power Level Guy

High Class Warrior
Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2023
Messages
4,619
Sure! I concede!! Done! No use speaking about it any more. I've said I lost.
We already know you lost, we want you to admit that you've been making it all up. Or that you were so disillusioned you were led astray. Come back to reality.
 

Warmmedown

Super Elite
Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2015
Messages
16,936
Age
32
Huh? I don't even use this shit anymore lol. Ppl can't read a long text without thinking it's chat GPT anymore. When I sit down on my chair and feel like writing in a way that details my PoV with proper sentence structure, I write like that. Just not often. But even if I were still paying GPT, how would I use it to make arguments for me? I mean, I don't think it even knows about those things at all.
That's absurdly different to how you write, not a little different. I've been reading your posts for 5+ years, including long posts about various subjects. Even before you said you were Luffy on Sherdog, I saw your posts and suspected it was you. This one isn't you. There are signs of it being AI, but I'm not gonna say them since you'll start correcting it if there's a next time. It also says nonsensical things in there. "I'm not asking anyone to swallow ghosts". "Midcity Diagnostics" - doesn't exist. Bunch of other stuff that is just made up terms. It's also obvious be you don't post sources for any of the supposed evidence, since they been fabricated by AI.


I'm speaking that to you guys, I'm just showing that I am sure of what I am saying. I wasn't lying either when I said Chimaev invited me to his Instagram private group and posted inside info confirming vaulted fights. Anyways, I know what I'm talking about, I have had information that you have not... And I'm ok with that. I don't feel like I need to go on with that. I'm sure of what I'm speaking about. You don't need to believe me. Rather, I prefer you think I'm crazy, that'd be a relief at least because from the get go, I should have approached all this info in a smarter way. Anyways, I'm ok with whatever you believe. I have my understanding of things, I fully trust that, you don't. It's ok. I literally feel no desire to go deeper on this.

Or maybe as a way to settle this, take that as me conceding that I've lost. I've no willingness to engage further so you win.
Just spewing nonsense, not actually addressing that yeh, you flip flop between "I'm trolling/joking" to "it was a projection" to "I've seen the fight".

Huge troll or nutjob conspiracy theorist. If it's the first, just tanked my respect for you. The latter...damn.
 

ahill

Super Elite
Donor
Joined
Sep 4, 2015
Messages
15,171
That's absurdly different to how you write, not a little different. I've been reading your posts for 5+ years, including long posts about various subjects. Even before you said you were Luffy on Sherdog, I saw your posts and suspected it was you. This one isn't you. There are signs of it being AI, but I'm not gonna say them since you'll start correcting it if there's a next time. It also says nonsensical things in there. "I'm not asking anyone to swallow ghosts". "Midcity Diagnostics" - doesn't exist. Bunch of other stuff that is just made up terms. It's also obvious be you don't post sources for any of the supposed evidence, since they been fabricated by AI.
Huh? No it's not. Not when I take time to post like making a full analysis mode. Compare that to my old (around 2018 or so) analysis for DB topics. They'd be exactly like that, same structure and same intention, same tone I would write in (only, my vocabulary was lacking back then). That could not be more me when writing like a threat meant as an analysis.

Sometimes I don't use topics addressing specific issues, and rather mention them while writing. That's depending on my purpose though. Sometimes I like separating in topics like that
 

ahill

Super Elite
Donor
Joined
Sep 4, 2015
Messages
15,171
That's absurdly different to how you write, not a little different. I've been reading your posts for 5+ years, including long posts about various subjects. Even before you said you were Luffy on Sherdog, I saw your posts and suspected it was you. This one isn't you. There are signs of it being AI, but I'm not gonna say them since you'll start correcting it if there's a next time. It also says nonsensical things in there. "I'm not asking anyone to swallow ghosts". "Midcity Diagnostics" - doesn't exist. Bunch of other stuff that is just made up terms. It's also obvious be you don't post sources for any of the supposed evidence, since they been fabricated by AI.



Just spewing nonsense, not actually addressing that yeh, you flip flop between "I'm trolling/joking" to "it was a projection" to "I've seen the fight".

Huge troll or nutjob conspiracy theorist. If it's the first, just tanked my respect for you. The latter...damn.
Btw Tom said he has been on a 5 rounds being elbowed to the face. Take that as you will. Check his fight lab episode before Juliana Peña vs Kayla Harrison.

You're welcome. Who knows, knows.
 

ahill

Super Elite
Donor
Joined
Sep 4, 2015
Messages
15,171
@Warmmedown

They'll probably do Khamzat Chimaev vs Pereira at HW. Gustafsson said he trained with Chimaev and that he couldn't even get up when Chimaev took him down and that he has the strength of a HW, speed of a lightweight and a way better wrestling than Khabib but with HW squeeze strength...

Chimaev said he thinks Alex will definitely get the belt in HW and then he will go to HW to fight Alex. He said he got so much better that weighing ~210 lb he thinks he can beat any HW, even Alex Pereira.
 

Latest profile posts

Warmmedown wrote on Fantastische Hure's profile.
wait wtf when did you turn 31, I swear you were 30. Oh fk I forgot your bday is in April...
Warmmedown wrote on Fantastische Hure's profile.
cmondosomethingshc.jpg
Top