I think it makes complete sense. Monster has such a good setup and intrigue in it's plot and characters, imagine if that was all resolved in a haphazard and lackluster way. It would be difficult to reread those sections when you know all the seeds that the author planted to keep the reader invested doesn't end up paying off in a satisfying way.Not really. I can still appreciate the parts that I enjoyed prior. I don't think it makes sense to change your opinion on something that you enjoyed retrospectively due to a drop in quality later on.
It will definitely change your overall view of the series, but I think you can separate the complete work from segments that were memorable for the right reasons. Part one of one piece is an example. I don't think less of the Alabasta arc because of how bad Fishman Island is.I think it makes complete sense. Monster has such a good setup and intrigue in it's plot and characters, imagine if that was all resolved in a haphazard and lackluster way. It would be difficult to reread those sections when you know all the seeds that the author planted to keep the reader invested doesn't end up paying off in a satisfying way.
Is fuckmeng Island even part of the new worldProbably Fishman Island. Just completely irrelevant considering the lack of threat and how the New World was meant to be a big step up.
What do you think of Bonney being 10-12 years old and the implications it has on Blackbeard wanting her cunt back in Part 1 :withheldTechnically no but it’s the roadblock to getting to the New World, and it was supposedly under Yonko protection.
Would you quit One Piece if it turns out he did?I mean there's little chance that he actually knew her true age.
Bro wtf was that lol. I was expecting something like one of Roberto Carlos' insane shots from a wide angle.Thoughts on this Demichelis wonder goal: