I mean, I completely agree with ahill on this, but this HxH VS OP debate is becoming pretty stale, particularly when the main argument in OP's favour comes down to "Togashi's art is bad" or "text walls!", which is pretty superficial compared to plot and characters (also, Togashi can produce great art for the series every once in a while, even if extremely inconsistent).
Fantastische Hure said:
Current One-Piece is probably still better. Comparing them both in their peaks isn't even a contest.
I have more positive things to say about the Election Arc of HxH compared to the writing of the past two OP Arcs, and the Election Arc is far worse than Current HxH.
Fantastische Hure said:
I wouldn't. He doesn't seem like a good character to me. Besides I recently saw an image where they showed every-time or a lot of times when Hunter x Hunter (Gon) ripped-off DragonBall (Goku). Side by side comparisons.
There were a lot of times in which Luffy "ripped off" Goku as well. Both eaten copious amounts of food, being immune to some kind of dangerous technique (Akkumite Beam/Mero Mero Mellow), etc. If the artistic inspiration within Gon's fights is enough to count as a "ripoff", so are these.
Gon's main difference compared to Luffy is also that he's overall a more realistc character. His somewhat dumb and selfish actions make more sense when taking into account that is how a typical 12 year old would act in terms of their mindset and morality, whereas Luffy's lack of knowledge on most that isn't fighting comes off as inconsistent when taking into account the opportunities for education he's been given and his age. Gon also goes through some major changes during the Chimera Ant Arc, whereas Luffy remains entirely static throughout the series; something that becomes a major problem for the writing of the CP9 Arc and even more so, the post-timeskip material.