- Joined
- Nov 14, 2016
- Messages
- 237
I shouldn't have laughed as hard as I laughed at this. That was great.Touching a chick's tits isn't sex boi
I shouldn't have laughed as hard as I laughed at this. That was great.Touching a chick's tits isn't sex boi
But would it be considered rape under legal definitions?I shouldn't have laughed as hard as I laughed at this. That was great.
They know their audience.Btw, mangas in general should stop sexualizing minors.
In the Japanese version he straight up says he's gonna feel her upI forgot all about that. That is actually really fucked up.
> Their mentalities aren't that of an adultTeenagers are biologically adults though. I know this doesn’t help my point but it’s just that they’re mentally still children.
Many, if not most, manga readers are people of those ages. I see nothing wrong with being turned on by images of people of your age being sexualized.Doesn't matter. Ppl who find it funny and cool to have minors sexualized in mangas, some even as young as 14, are sick in the head.
Sometimes people don't grow out of that attraction though.Many, if not most, manga readers are people of those ages. I see nothing wrong with being turned on by images of people of your age being sexualized.
Censoring things that may be harmful towards groups isn't a bad concept. Censoring is an ample term as well... Or you think things shouldn't be censored and just allow whatever they want to put in to be displayed? Censoring with critical thinking behind is more like not allowing harmful things.
Chinese Army I think. Or NK or Soviet. https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-a...imple-olive-green-army-uniform-126945419.htmlI wonder what the star in Oolong's hat means/is a reference to.
Can it not be funny because it's awkward? Or it's funny in a nostalgic way (like "haha, I remember being that age").Doesn't matter. Ppl who find it funny and cool to have minors sexualized in mangas, some even as young as 14, are sick in the head.
Because it's making light of sexualizing/groping minors by taking it in a comedic way. It's basically trivializing an issue by making it seem like a basic non-serious act. I'm saying it done from the PoV of comedic, gag scenes not done with the needed seriousness. Berserk for example depicted heinous scenes but in a serious way in which people could see the act as totally deranged and morally wrong, which is imo ok to be portrayed since it wasn't making little of the issue.Why the hell censor groping and not vicious murder? Tf? Shows have always had sexual content, including works written and drawn by women.
There are shows on Netflix that show a character who's fictionally 16 having sex with a grown man. As long as the actors look adult and it's pointed out statutory rape is wrong in the show, I don't see any reason to censor shit unnecessarily. Teenagers especially have high sex drives than 30+ year olds, and they're more likely to be attracted to other minors their age. As long as actual minors aren't committing sex acts I don't see what's wrong with juvenile media using sex appeal to boost ratings. You didn't get problem doodles to 16 year old girls when you were a minor or barely an adult?Because it's making light of sexualizing/groping minors by taking it in a comedic way. It's basically trivializing an issue by making it seem like a basic non-serious act. I'm saying it done from the PoV of comedic, gag scenes not done with the needed seriousness. Berserk for example depicted heinous scenes but in a serious way in which people could see the act as totally deranged and morally wrong, which is imo ok to be portrayed since it wasn't making little of the issue.