- Joined
- Mar 26, 2017
- Messages
- 14,829
- Age
- 22
I think the 50x is pretty much undeniable, but I like this list anyway. It's a cool experiment, and a much more realistic one than ignoring in-series numbers like you do.
How is ignoring logic realistic? I stick with the in universe logic over some thrown together numbers that had no plan.and a much more realistic one than ignoring in-series numbers like you do.
No, that has never been the argument. The argument has been that the author has made a set of narrative claims that completely go against the numbers he is presented. These are valid reasons for offering alternatives, this isn't a fly by night situation. The author says hey 1+1=3, when we all know 1+1=2. These are author errors, not mere reader preference.Your logic ignore numbers straight for the manga. You say "it's super, it's official, yet you're ignoring even then original manga because you think it flows better".
It would be. Because there's no truly valid reasonings. It's all personal preference. As mentioned before, the issues I've brought up are truly legit. You are nitpicking with your problem with the 50x boost. I've raised actual real concerns about author errors. You have not. You raised concerns about your own personal view of things. That's the difference.So saying it's a no contest for the SSJ multiplier to be 59x because it's displayed in a guidebook but ignore some numbers from the manga is using a contradictory logic...
100%. There are reasonable issues that can be addressed where the author is flat out wrong and there are issues where it's going too far to change things. The Super Saiyan form being 50x while imperfect is nowhere near the level of issue that I'm raising.Like "I've a sensible reason to ignore even the thing given in the manga, you have not for ignoring a guidebook".
How is ignoring logic realistic? I stick with the in universe logic over some thrown together numbers that had no plan.
It's head canon no doubt, but head canon can be logical. Head canon can also present superior options than the original author did. That's the point, to do better than the author. To "fix" his mistakes. That's the entire point.That’s not logic, that’s head canon.
It is logical. If were are bound by the in universe laws of logic and consistency that is. We see what a 1.33x gap is portrayed as multiple times. Cui vs Vegeta is not consistently portrayed as a 1.33x gap. This is 100% portrayed in the story. Vegeta smashing Cui so easily has always been a point of contention, so much so, that we've come up with a reason why it happened. Yuuki loss. There's a reason that argument is needed to be made.You think yours is logical. That's the difference. You also don't use the 24k ~ 18k spacing for the Freeza arc because you feel the gaps should another way.
The in universe world treats transformations as fixed boosts. That's what 90% of the readers walk away with understanding.It wasn't stated to be a fixed one which will be the same for every other reason...
So you think King Piccolo > Kami is ok going by the guidebook numbers?I now think the best way to look at the numbers presented in those sagas are as a foundation for later Sagas. It’s not even good to make up numbers for Dragon Ball/Part I, IMO.
No, I’m saying it’s not good to ignore the Farmer being 5 or Roshi being 139. Not saying those numbers are from Dragon Ball, but just that they’re around the level of power seen in Dragon Ball.So you think King Piccolo > Kami is ok going by the guidebook numbers?
Then you have to dismiss 90% of the character statements in Dragonball. Is King Piccolo using less than half power to fight Goku or not?No, I’m saying it’s not good to ignore the Farmer being 5 or Roshi being 139. Not saying those numbers are from Dragon Ball, but just that they’re around the level of power seen in Dragon Ball.
The topic is Part 1. You are rattling on about a topic I am not bringing up. Stick to the topic please.Well, part 1 aside, then you'll be discussing the Freeza saga ignoring numbers from the very inventor who you are discussing about.
At the end of the day, I think the BoZ numbers are below the acceptable standard, whereas everything else is acceptable, even though it's not perfect.I agree the BoZ numbers weren't given proper thought. But is that the only one you think is off and ignore?
Just as you agreed that BoZ numbers were not given proper thought, I think Vegeta's 18k number is not given the PERFECT thought. It's acceptable enough and we should probably just deal with it, but Earth Vegeta being 1.5x is much better. Because we are forced to accept certain narrative elements that are false. Cui and Vegeta do not rival Dodoria, and Cui is tremendously weaker than Vegeta or should be regardless of his Yuuki situation.Because you also say thinking of Vegeta's power up from Earth as 1.5x is better
Because the numbers go against the author's own narrative, as I've expressed numerous times.But that would also fall in the realm of discrediting the very gap given in the story,
There's no real problem. There's good, better, best. I'm trying to convince you that the smaller multiplier isn't best. We aren't talking about the same levels of argumentation for the topics here.so idk the problem with me having a 40x or a 10x multiplier.
The author wrote it with 10x in mind. But there's certain in universe issues making it 10x I feel.I mean, he really wasn't, so adhering to a 50x one for the sake of it being like that in the Freeza arc despite numbers in many stances legit flowing better with a 10x
Having Base Gotenks about double the Cell Jrs certainly wouldn't be considered piss weak. So long as Base Gotenks is way above the Super Saiyan kids, it should be fine, he's all hype anyway.If you also have SSJ Gotenks not that much above SSJ3 Goku pre RoSsT and the SSJ as 50x, there's no way you wouldn't have base Gotenks as piss weak before the RoSaT, which he doesn't seem to be.