Movie 10 SSjin Broli vs Super Bojack

[Wogman]

Trunks hair was short. Yet in movie 8, his hair was long. And since he went last in the time chamber, that means everyone is 2nd rosat.

His hair was short because Bulma cut it right before he went to Kami's Temple. He still had long hair until one day after their fight with Semi Cell and Perfect Cell.

But Gohan and Goku where in the time chamber, and when they came out, his hair was short, and the only time he got long hair was after he went into the time chamber the second time.

 

[Wogman]

How do you know they're few? The fact that he didn't destroy the entire galaxy is enough.

Spoiler

No it isn't. It's been confirmed by Goku that he already destroyed the southern galaxy

And ? No seriously, I hope you truly don't think 1 or 1000 planets effect the destruction of a galaxy. But a galaxy has hundreds of billions of solar systems, planets and stars.

According to you, if someone destroyed a planet and there was a boulder left over, he didn't destroy that planet. Grasp how big a galaxy is before you show a few planets and stars as a comparison

 

[Let's Go Fearless!]

I'm not gonna debate this busting feats since I have't explored to this yet and still debatable.

 

[SSJ2]

He's a galaxy buster. Stop whining you grand tour loving faggot.

 

[Let's Go Fearless!]

He's a galaxy buster. Stop whining you grand tour loving faggot.

Change my fuking name!

 

[Tapion]

The way i see it;
Super Bojack >= FP Perfect Cell >> M8 LSSj Broly > M10 SSj Broly

Bojack fought quite a lot stronger versions of Z-Senshi and defeated all of them with little to no effort in base, and his increase from Base to FP should be pretty respectable. He rapes Broly IMO.

 

[Keedounan]

No it isn't. It's been confirmed by Goku that he already destroyed the southern galaxy

And ? No seriously, I hope you truly don't think 1 or 1000 planets effect the destruction of a galaxy. But a galaxy has hundreds of billions of solar systems, planets and stars.

According to you, if someone destroyed a planet and there was a boulder left over, he didn't destroy that planet. Grasp how big a galaxy is before you show a few planets and stars as a comparison

https://youtu.be/rpHdgn3UaBc?t=6m4s

Care to explain why we're able to see some planets and so many stars if the galaxy has been destroyed ?

Destroying most of the galaxy's planets and stars =/= Destroying the galaxy.

 

[Tapion]

Broly didn't destroy the Southern Galaxy, but laid waste to it.

North Kaio: Mm. He’s already finished tearing up the Southern Galaxy, and appears to be after my Northern Galaxy next [...] First go check the Southern Galaxy.

North Kaio's last underlined statement clearly implies the Southern Galaxy is still there - it's just damaged. This can easily mean civilization, and Herms agrees:

On that note, after Goku thinks to himself that Broli is the one who "destroyed" the Southern Galaxy, he shortly thereafter semi-repeats himself, saying that Broli is the Super Saiyan who "ran riot through" the Southern Galaxy. So it seems like all this makes the most sense if we treat "destroy" in this context as meaning that Broli attacked/laid waste/etc the Southern Galaxy. That is, he just went from planet to planet destroying the civilizations there, leaving ruined planets like the one Goku visits for a bit. The only thing that seems to indicate that he literally wiped it out completely is the opening shot of the spiral galaxy thingy dissolving into blackness, but this doesn't jibe too well with what we see/are told throughout the rest of the movie.

The context of the movie implies Broly has been laying waste to the Southern Galaxy by destroying its civilizations, not the galaxy itself. In fact, Planet New Vegeta seems to be located in the Southern Galaxy, though there is no direct statement.

At about 32:55 in the movie, Paragus states he wants to set base on "Earth, in the North Galaxy" heavily implying New Vegeta is not located on said galaxy. The only other quadrant that would fit the context of the movie is the Southern Galaxy.

Herms:

Also, a bit more on what the movie means by "destroy": it's said that Broli "attacked" Planet Shamo, after which its inhabitants were moved to New Planet Vegeta. But Planet Shamo is clearly still physically there, since we see Broli actually blow it up midway through the movie. This seems consistent with the idea that Broli went around attacking planets by destroying the cities/civilizations on them, rather than blowing them up Freeza-style.

 

[Let's Go Fearless!]

Broly didn't destroy the Southern Galaxy, but laid waste to it.

North Kaio: Mm. He’s already finished tearing up the Southern Galaxy, and appears to be after my Northern Galaxy next [...] First go check the Southern Galaxy.

North Kaio's last underlined statement clearly implies the Southern Galaxy is still there - it's just damaged. This can easily mean civilization, and Herms agrees:

On that note, after Goku thinks to himself that Broli is the one who "destroyed" the Southern Galaxy, he shortly thereafter semi-repeats himself, saying that Broli is the Super Saiyan who "ran riot through" the Southern Galaxy. So it seems like all this makes the most sense if we treat "destroy" in this context as meaning that Broli attacked/laid waste/etc the Southern Galaxy. That is, he just went from planet to planet destroying the civilizations there, leaving ruined planets like the one Goku visits for a bit. The only thing that seems to indicate that he literally wiped it out completely is the opening shot of the spiral galaxy thingy dissolving into blackness, but this doesn't jibe too well with what we see/are told throughout the rest of the movie.

The context of the movie implies Broly has been laying waste to the Southern Galaxy by destroying its civilizations, not the galaxy itself. In fact, Planet New Vegeta seems to be located in the Southern Galaxy, though there is no direct statement.

At about 32:55 in the movie, Paragus states he wants to set base on "Earth, in the North Galaxy" heavily implying New Vegeta is not located on said galaxy. The only other quadrant that would fit the context of the movie is the Southern Galaxy.

Herms:

Also, a bit more on what the movie means by "destroy": it's said that Broli "attacked" Planet Shamo, after which its inhabitants were moved to New Planet Vegeta. But Planet Shamo is clearly still physically there, since we see Broli actually blow it up midway through the movie. This seems consistent with the idea that Broli went around attacking planets by destroying the cities/civilizations on them, rather than blowing them up Freeza-style.

I can't like it but I'm giving you a thumbs up from my kitty

 

[p123]

Dude, Broly tore through a quadrant of the universe. His power truly is maximum.

 

[xmysticgohanx]

Bojack stomps

 

[Wogman]

Broly didn't destroy the Southern Galaxy, but laid waste to it.

He destroyed it, we even see planets get destroyed when he was younger, which should indicate how he does things.

North Kaio: Mm. He’s already finished tearing up the Southern Galaxy, and appears to be after my Northern Galaxy next [...] First go check the Southern Galaxy.

North Kaio's last underlined statement clearly implies the Southern Galaxy is still there - it's just damaged. This can easily mean civilization, and Herms agrees:

"Go to the place where the house was before it was destroyed" going to the place where the southern galaxy was isn't suggesting the galaxy wasn't destroyed, nor does it jeopradize the fact the galaxy has planets and stars left over. Fact is, it was done over a short period of time, not one-shot. So a galaxy being some what there doesn't change anything.

On that note, after Goku thinks to himself that Broli is the one who "destroyed" the Southern Galaxy, he shortly thereafter semi-repeats himself, saying that Broli is the Super Saiyan who "ran riot through" the Southern Galaxy. So it seems like all this makes the most sense if we treat "destroy" in this context as meaning that Broli attacked/laid waste/etc the Southern Galaxy. That is, he just went from planet to planet destroying the civilizations there, leaving ruined planets like the one Goku visits for a bit. The only thing that seems to indicate that he literally wiped it out completely is the opening shot of the spiral galaxy thingy dissolving into blackness, but this doesn't jibe too well with what we see/are told throughout the rest of the movie.

Herms doesn't take into account that the point of the galaxy scene being destroyed. It was merely a set up for the legendary super saiyan status. Goku appearing on broken planets makes sense since they where fooling Vegeta the whole time. Planets left over was clearly apart of the plan. Hence why they gave Vegeta false reports

The context of the movie implies Broly has been laying waste to the Southern Galaxy by destroying its civilizations, not the galaxy itself. In fact, Planet New Vegeta seems to be located in the Southern Galaxy, though there is no direct statement.

1: He never one-shot the galaxy
2: He also destroyed planets as a child

Him destroying civilization was done in order to set up the legendary super saiyan status, hence why they fooled Vegeta by saying Broly appeared on Todokama. The whole Galaxy scene was merely a set up for the legendary super saiyan.

At about 32:55 in the movie, Paragus states he wants to set base on "Earth, in the North Galaxy" heavily implying New Vegeta is not located on said galaxy. The only other quadrant that would fit the context of the movie is the Southern Galaxy.

It wouldn't since Goku instant transmission again, and nor would it matter seeing how Broly didn't one-shot it anyways.

Herms:

Also, a bit more on what the movie means by "destroy": it's said that Broli "attacked" Planet Shamo, after which its inhabitants were moved to New Planet Vegeta. But Planet Shamo is clearly still physically there, since we see Broli actually blow it up midway through the movie. This seems consistent with the idea that Broli went around attacking planets by destroying the cities/civilizations on them, rather than blowing them up Freeza-style.

[/quote]

Kid Broly disagrees, and again, ignoring the whole point of the galaxy destruction scene

https://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/11122/111223567/4710440-8223336466-13544.jpg

 

[Wogman]

And ? No seriously, I hope you truly don't think 1 or 1000 planets effect the destruction of a galaxy. But a galaxy has hundreds of billions of solar systems, planets and stars.

According to you, if someone destroyed a planet and there was a boulder left over, he didn't destroy that planet. Grasp how big a galaxy is before you show a few planets and stars as a comparison

https://youtu.be/rpHdgn3UaBc?t=6m4s

Care to explain why we're able to see some planets and so many stars if the galaxy has been destroyed ?

Destroying most of the galaxy's planets and stars =/= Destroying the galaxy.

Actually it is destroying the galaxy. Again, grasp how bloody big a freaking galaxy is and compare a few thousand stars and planets to it. It's nothing, like a few spicks of a brick being left over from a destroyed house.

 

[Keedounan]

And ? No seriously, I hope you truly don't think 1 or 1000 planets effect the destruction of a galaxy. But a galaxy has hundreds of billions of solar systems, planets and stars.

According to you, if someone destroyed a planet and there was a boulder left over, he didn't destroy that planet. Grasp how big a galaxy is before you show a few planets and stars as a comparison

https://youtu.be/rpHdgn3UaBc?t=6m4s

Care to explain why we're able to see some planets and so many stars if the galaxy has been destroyed ?

Destroying most of the galaxy's planets and stars =/= Destroying the galaxy.

Actually it is destroying the galaxy. Again, grasp how bloody big a freaking galaxy is and compare a few thousand stars and planets to it. It's nothing, like a few spicks of a brick being left over from a destroyed house.

Again, destroying most of the galaxy =/= destroying the galaxy. And even if it was the case, Broly did it in decades, with the help of a very fast spaceship.

 

[Let's Go Fearless!]

The fact is, the universe has only 28 planets makes it easier for Broly to get the job done.

 

[Wogman]

https://youtu.be/rpHdgn3UaBc?t=6m4s

Care to explain why we're able to see some planets and so many stars if the galaxy has been destroyed ?

Destroying most of the galaxy's planets and stars =/= Destroying the galaxy.

Actually it is destroying the galaxy. Again, grasp how bloody big a freaking galaxy is and compare a few thousand stars and planets to it. It's nothing, like a few spicks of a brick being left over from a destroyed house.

Again, destroying most of the galaxy =/= destroying the galaxy. And even if it was the case, Broly did it in decades, with the help of a very fast spaceship.

Incorrect on both parts

1: Destroying 99.999999999999999% of a galaxy = galaxy destruction, again and again, grasp how bloody big a galaxy is before you make such measly comparisons
2: Broly never did it in decades. It was said by the narrator and confirmed by King kai that RSSJ Broly destroyed the galaxy, the narrator said a Super saiyan destroyed the galaxy. King kai said that at the rate he is going, he is going to destroy his own northern galaxy next. Plus King kai couldn't track Broly, and yet he kept up with spaceships no problem
3: There wasn't any spaceship of Kid Broly destroying the planets
4: The point of the galaxy scene was for a set up of the legendary super saiyan, which Paragus planned AFTER he controlled Broly

Broly done it in hours

 

[ahill1]

Tapion, I summon you!!!!!!

 

[Keedounan]

Actually it is destroying the galaxy. Again, grasp how bloody big a freaking galaxy is and compare a few thousand stars and planets to it. It's nothing, like a few spicks of a brick being left over from a destroyed house.

Again, destroying most of the galaxy =/= destroying the galaxy. And even if it was the case, Broly did it in decades, with the help of a very fast spaceship.

Incorrect on both parts

1: Destroying 99.999999999999999% of a galaxy = galaxy destruction, again and again, grasp how bloody big a galaxy is before you make such measly comparisons

Done already. Still don't care. And he never did it in one-shot anyways, so why should I care ? Plus, it's not like we know if there isn't more star/planets, as Goku was only going in the ravaged planet.

2: Broly never did it in decades.

There was flashbacks of him starting his destructions when he was a teen: https://youtu.be/IA4fdEaAkgY
Even after growing up, he was still doing that.

It was said by the narrator and confirmed by King kai that RSSJ Broly destroyed the galaxy

"Attacked" the galaxy. Sorry, I don't rely on the dub. And for such a galaxy, King Kai all but points Goku towards its direction.

the narrator said a Super saiyan destroyed the galaxy.

"Attacked" the Galaxy. Watch the subs.

King kai said that at the rate he is going, he is going to destroy his own northern galaxy next.

Again, to "attack" his own nothern galaxy. And to answer to "at this rate", it still took the Galaxy being nearly destroyed to react.

Plus King kai couldn't track Broly, and yet he kept up with spaceships no problem

Right, as if Broly just flied in the Galaxy to do what he did.

3: There wasn't any spaceship of Kid Broly destroying the planets

So what ? Are you suggesting that Broly and Paragus were just flying around in the Galaxy to do the deed ? That they are MFTL and can breath in the Galaxy ?

4: The point of the galaxy scene was for a set up of the legendary super saiyan, which Paragus planned AFTER he controlled Broly

Broly has already done some work anyways. And we don't exactly WHEN he controlled Broly. Goku was fully grown up when he was 21, so for all we know, it might have still took years.

Broly done it in hours

Pretty great assumption if you ask me. Besides, I'm beginning to think that they were just assaulting civilizations instead of the galaxy. It makes sense with the flashbacks and Broly's method in the movie (planet by planet), but it's not like you'll ever agree, right ? So let's agree to disagree.

 

[Wogman]

Done already. Still don't care. And he never did it in one-shot anyways, so why should I care ? Plus, it's not like we know if there isn't more star/planets, as Goku was only going in the ravaged planet.

"Still don't care" if you don't care, then don't reply.

There was flashbacks of him starting his destructions when he was a teen: https://youtu.be/IA4fdEaAkgY
Even after growing up, he was still doing that.

It's clear you didn't watch the movie, because him destroying planets as a child isn't related to him destroying the galaxy since the idea was given from Paragus AFTER he controlled his son, not before. So no

"Attacked" the galaxy. Sorry, I don't rely on the dub. And for such a galaxy, King Kai all but points Goku towards its direction.

Lol and ? He pointed to the direction proves what ? Seriously reread your arguments before presenting them.

"Attacked" the Galaxy. Watch the subs.

Yeah, and many others like King Kai and Goku said he destroyed it as well, clearly the people scripting the movie don't see a difference between attacking, tearing up and destroying.

Again, to "attack" his own nothern galaxy. And to answer to "at this rate", it still took the Galaxy being nearly destroyed to react.

Actually go watch the subs, but since you are not bothered

DESTROYED

I hope you understand what it means "AT this Rate", meaning the speed Broly is doing things, he can destroy his own northern galaxy next.

Right, as if Broly just flied in the Galaxy to do what he did.

Yeah, he did, just he did as a baby getting off Planet Vegeta while sleeping lol flying in space as a baby is shown not to be a problem for him.

So what ? Are you suggesting that Broly and Paragus were just flying around in the Galaxy to do the deed ? That they are MFTL and can breath in the Galaxy ?

-.- seriously you just prove you never watched the movie, Baby Broly literally was flying in space asleep. And Paragus ? lol I guess you didn't get the memo when paragus was on earth and said WHILE he was on earth that the legendary super saiyan was destroying the southern galaxy.

Broly has already done some work anyways. And we don't exactly WHEN he controlled Broly. Goku was fully grown up when he was 21, so for all we know, it might have still took years.

Yeah what work ? Destroying 2 or 3 planets ? or 300 planets before being controlled, yeah sorry lol that's still nothing to a galaxy, wouldn't even measure to even star level spacing. Its confirmed that RSSJ Broly, the one Goku fought against, destroyed the galaxy.

Pretty great assumption if you ask me. Besides, I'm beginning to think that they were just assaulting civilizations instead of the galaxy. It makes sense with the flashbacks and Broly's method in the movie (planet by planet), but it's not like you'll ever agree, right ? So let's agree to disagree.

It isn't an assumption, considering both King Kai and Paragus said Broly was destroying the galaxy while talking to others, let Paragus did on earth and King kai with the "at this rate" comment. Meaning Broly is destroying it right in front of them. And it was confirmed by king Kai a SSj was doing it, and that SSJ was RSSJ Broly against Goku.

 

[Pakl]

Do you seriously argue that Broli is a galaxy buster??? Lmao... He just left the galaxy in ruins and destroyed planets... No one except gods level can bust galaxies... Get the outta here noob