- Joined
- Jun 1, 2015
- Messages
- 30,769
- Age
- 29
Come-back when you created anything half as influential as
I did.
It's true he is integral to Pokemon's existence in some-ways, but Pokemon is Satoshi Tajiri's brain-child at the end of the day & came from his imagination (and Ken Sugimori's designs).Nintendo and modern gaming in general would look very different without Miyamoto and his works, not just Zelda and Mario, but Donkey Kong as well. Without his foundation I don't think Pokemon would exist.
That's true, but I don't think you can discount Miyamoto's influence. Miyamoto's franchises came without something like Pokemon whereas I feel that Miyamoto helped facilitate PokemonIt's true he is integral to Pokemon's existence in some-ways, but Pokemon is Satoshi Tajiri's brain-child at the end of the day & came from his imagination (and Ken Sugimori's designs).
That's true, but I don't think you can discount Miyamoto's influence. Miyamoto's franchises came without something like Pokemon whereas I feel that Miyamoto helped facilitate Pokemon
Anime and manga are much less mainstream globally than video games^So do you think AT's out of their league here?
Is AT's genius (not book-intelligence) any-where near?Anime and manga are much less mainstream globally than video games
I find his works to be much less impressive than the others but I guess that's due to the mediumIs AT's genius (not book-intelligence) any-where near?
Zelda is not that popular in Japan. In what countries/continents is Zelda popular in compared to not popular in? Pokemon is popular everywhere.
That is if you talk about success of-course, since genius =/= success.
Also:Pokemon is only good for making money.