But you use the perceived difference in movement to make a comparison yourself
"Maybe he seemed a little more impressive than Recoome, but still not as 'impressive' as Vegeta vs #19 imo. Hence why I think 70% seems to be a good middle ground."
Because Vegeta was moved more considerably in the Cell's case. Sure, there's the position Cell's fist connected with Vegeta's face, which I had already considered as something someone could bring up, but wished to analyze both instances as far as the movements go.
P said the tank feat was comparable and I pointed out why they weren't comparable because I see it as Vegeta moving out more considerably in the second instance... whether that is because Cell got him into a hook or because Cell was simply more powerful in comparison to #19, that doesn't matter (yeah, forget the part I said the gap is like 70%)... which matters is that P wasn't considering the technique employed by each fighter on his comments and was only considering how much "budged" Vegeta got after each punch -- and my post comparing how much budged Vegeta got after each punch works as a retort for that -- not to how much the gap should be.
It MIGHT invalidate the point (I say might because it's still debatable whether punching someone frontally will budge said someone more than getting them into a hook) that the gap between Semi Cell and Vegeta is bigger because of THAT. It doesn't invalidate the point that the tank feat is not enough to draw a comparison between the combatant's relationship. The amount every one of them was moved COULD be important (as in, if the punch technique doesn't have a difference favoring the amount Vegeta was budged vs #19) because it denotes a feat as less impressive than the other. If someone was budged more considerably than the other, then said tank would be less impressive despite both being moved up.