- Joined
- Aug 21, 2016
- Messages
- 878
- Age
- 26
Right. Goku is stated to have integrated its power into his very being so it's accessible by his regular and Super Saiyan forms. We are told later on that Goku didn't have the ability to use god ki until his training with Whis. Since the power is integrated into his being and does not "expire", then that would mean that Goku can use that power without god ki.If anything, I'm not disagreeing with this. Yes, he preserved the SSJ God Powers and remained within himself, but that's his internal power, as any other form of the SSJ actually is. Also, the quote you're giving it also can be explained by how he preserved the transformation and why he can make access of it, those are distinct form of view and what you say isn't an absolute answer.
No. This is a common storytelling strategy Toriyama has always used in Dragon Ball. Characters are able to sense ki which gives us a fundamental understanding of how powerful characters are in the series. SSJ Vegeta surpassed SSJ Goku and we wouldn't need any actions to support that. The author expected us to believe it because that's what the narrative is leading us to believe. Same thing here.Intellectually dishonest right off the batt, okay. No, I believe more in actions than simple words, Enraged Vegeta proved himself better than his regular forms (not his divine forms, though) from afterwards and so on.
Doesn't matter. They allowed Trunks to go from Super Saiyan 2 to Super Saiyan Blue which means he can get as powerful as he wants at the writers' whim. That being said, Super Saiyan was a specific power that could only be obtained by rage. Outside of that, it's not a common trait that Saiyans other than Gohan could undergo. That much is obvious.That's something that have a strong narrative charge against, as the whole Episode 57 have, so no, that isn't evidence. Goku through anger alone became stronger than Freeza by going SSJ, so the anger concept has always been there. Super is still a continuation of DBZ and have to follow its logic, it's not a completely different continuation or that has nothing to do with canon, so no.
Well, we were discussing about how much valid is SSJ3 Gotenks feat is and how Toei portrays it, but if you don't have any counter, then I'm fine with that.
Sure. But the ToP stuff is a strong narrative change so that shouldn't be used as evidence. That would be your logic.