He was referring his power level against Broly on M8 whether he was relevant or not.Zoro said:Because it still happened? This film takes place directly after the 7 year gap, so why would he refer to anything but when he was relevant?
Well Goku doesn't know how strong Broly have become.Spiral-Force said:Based on his feats, and the SSJ2 Goku > LSSJ Broly implication at the end of M11, I wouldn't put him any higher than Super Perfect Cell.
Perhaps, but Goku & Pikkon were sent to defeat Broly at the end of M11, and the former being present in M12 suggests that the mission was a success. Pikkon is a good deal weaker than Goku, so I doubt he did anything worthwhile.Fearless Saiyajin said:Well Goku doesn't know how strong Broly have become.Spiral-Force said:Based on his feats, and the SSJ2 Goku > LSSJ Broly implication at the end of M11, I wouldn't put him any higher than Super Perfect Cell.
Or he could have beat him as SSj3.Spiral-Force said:Perhaps, but Goku & Pikkon were sent to defeat Broly at the end of M11, and the former being present in M12 suggests that the mission was a success. Pikkon is a good deal weaker than Goku, so I doubt he did anything worthwhile.Fearless Saiyajin said:Well Goku doesn't know how strong Broly have become.Spiral-Force said:Based on his feats, and the SSJ2 Goku > LSSJ Broly implication at the end of M11, I wouldn't put him any higher than Super Perfect Cell.
Why would SSJ3 Goku be required to defeat someone that struggled to maintain dominance over a weak and rusty SSJ2 Gohan?Fearless Saiyajin said:Or he could have beat him as SSj3.Spiral-Force said:Perhaps, but Goku & Pikkon were sent to defeat Broly at the end of M11, and the former being present in M12 suggests that the mission was a success. Pikkon is a good deal weaker than Goku, so I doubt he did anything worthwhile.Fearless Saiyajin said:Well Goku doesn't know how strong Broly have become.
M10 implied that Gohan cannot beat Broly and resorted to drown him into the lava despite their fight suggest and that's Toei's inconsistencies similar to Vegeta/Janemba where SSj3 Goku can't beat and Vegeta managed to held himself. If Goku's SSj2 can't beat Broly then why not use SSj3? Either way, this is just speculation anyway as if Toei gives a damn whether how Goku beat Broly.Spiral-Force said:Why would SSJ3 Goku be required to defeat someone that struggled to maintain dominance over a weak and rusty SSJ2 Gohan?Fearless Saiyajin said:Or he could have beat him as SSj3.Spiral-Force said:Perhaps, but Goku & Pikkon were sent to defeat Broly at the end of M11, and the former being present in M12 suggests that the mission was a success. Pikkon is a good deal weaker than Goku, so I doubt he did anything worthwhile.
Janemba was smiling and toying around with Goku and Vegeta, Broly on the other hand looked pretty serious and frustrated for most of his fight with Gohan. Against Broly, Gohan got some decent hits in, he outmuscled him, outpaced him, and beat him with the help of SSJ Goten.Fearless Saiyajin said:M10 implied that Gohan cannot beat Broly and resorted to drown him into the lava despite their fight suggest and that's Toei's inconsistencies similar to Vegeta/Janemba where SSj3 Goku can't beat and Vegeta managed to held himself.
Why can't SSJ2 Goku beat Broly? Considering the latter's feats, there's nothing wrong with thinking: SSJ2 Goku > LSSJ Broly.Fearless Saiyajin said:If Goku's SSj2 can't beat Broly then why not use SSj3? Either way, this is just speculation anyway as if Toei gives a damn whether how Goku beat Broly.
No, Broly was smiling and laughing the whole time until Gohan managed to escape from him. Janemba on the other hand either toying or not doesn't contradict anything because that's just part of Toei's inconsistencies and both Super and DBZ anime suffered that way especially GT.Spiral-Force said:Janemba was smiling and toying around with Goku and Vegeta, Broly on the other hand looked pretty serious and frustrated for most of his fight with Gohan. Against Broly, Gohan got some decent hits in, he outmuscled him, outpaced him, and beat him with the help of SSJ Goten.Fearless Saiyajin said:M10 implied that Gohan cannot beat Broly and resorted to drown him into the lava despite their fight suggest and that's Toei's inconsistencies similar to Vegeta/Janemba where SSj3 Goku can't beat and Vegeta managed to held himself.
Why can't SSJ2 Goku beat Broly? Considering the latter's feats, there's nothing wrong with thinking: SSJ2 Goku > LSSJ Broly.Fearless Saiyajin said:If Goku's SSj2 can't beat Broly then why not use SSj3? Either way, this is just speculation anyway as if Toei gives a damn whether how Goku beat Broly.
I was referring to LSSJ Broly and SSJ2 Gohan's fight, pre-lava. Regardless, you can't disregard the points of the fight in which Broly showed frustration, got outmuscled, and got outpaced.Fearless Saiyajin said:No, Broly was smiling and laughing the whole time until Gohan managed to escape from him.
I didn't say it did. You were the one that brought up Janemba in the first place.Fearless Saiyajin said:Janemba on the other hand either toying or not doesn't contradict anything because that's just part of Toei's inconsistencies and both Super and DBZ anime suffered that way especially GT.
Feats imply or reinforce how strong a character is, a few explainable anomalies doesn't mean that they should never be used to determine a character's strength. Anyway, the statement that your referring to is under Broly's Super Saiyan sub-heading, implying that SSJ Broly > SSJ Goku. That doesn't speak volumes about the two at their strongest though.Fearless Saiyajin said:Feats doesn't mean anything in Toei's world and we must follow the statements only. Daizenshuu states that Broly surpass Goku so that's it.
No, he didn't. Gohan was owned in that fight and managed to lay 2 hits and that's it, Broly pretty much tanked Gohan's punch and kicks after that locked him back. And also Broly was smiling the whole time until Gohan managed to escaped from him.Spiral-Force said:I was referring to LSSJ Broly and SSJ2 Gohan's fight, pre-lava. Regardless, you can't disregard the points of the fight in which Broly showed frustration, got outmuscled, and got outpaced.
I brought it up to show how inconsistent the fight is despite their gap suggest.Spiral-Force said:I didn't say it did. You were the one that brought up Janemba in the first place.
Not in the Toei world lol.Spiral-Force said:Feats imply or reinforce how strong a character is, a few explainable anomalies doesn't mean that they should never be used to determine a character's strength. Anyway, the statement that your referring to is under Broly's Super Saiyan sub-heading, implying that SSJ Broly > SSJ Goku. That doesn't speak volumes about the two at their strongest though.
Broly's tanking feat is shaky at best when you consider that he couldn't tank Gohan's kick at 1:07, or at 1:09, or at 1:50 (after getting outmuscled). Regardless, tanking doesn't have to mean that the gap is as huge as you're making it out to be, considering that Piccolo Jr tanked Goku's Kamehameha, despite being slightly weaker than Goku. At the end of the day, Broly didn't do anything that SPC couldn't do, so putting Broly above him isn't necessary.Fearless Saiyajin said:No, he didn't. Gohan was owned in that fight and managed to lay 2 hits and that's it, Broly pretty much tanked Gohan's punch and kicks after that locked him back. And also Broly was smiling the whole time until Gohan managed to escaped from him.
[youtube]X913eWgbSOk[/youtube]
Your comparison has negative correlation, as Janemba was obviously toying with Goku & Vegeta, unless you're implying SSJ2 Vegeta ~ SSJ3 Goku, even though it was indicated: Goku >> Vegeta in the movie.Fearless Saiyajin said:I brought it up to show how inconsistent the fight is despite their gap suggest.
The margin is significant, but again, Broly didn't do anything that SPC couldn't do, so I have no reason to put him above that level.Fearless Saiyajin said:Not in the Toei world lol.
Either way, Broly handled Gohan easily which suggest that he's above than him by a wide margin.
So now you agree that it is inconsistency on Toei's part.Spiral-Force said:Broly's tanking feat is shaky at best when you consider that he couldn't tank Gohan's kick at 1:07, or at 1:09, or at 1:50 (after getting outmuscled). Regardless, tanking doesn't have to mean that the gap is as huge as you're making it out to be, considering that Piccolo Jr tanked Goku's Kamehameha, despite being slightly weaker than Goku. At the end of the day, Broly didn't do anything that SPC couldn't do, so putting Broly above him isn't necessary.
It's not that he was toying, what i'm saying is that it is inconsistency so its baseless if you use it as your argument.Spiral-Force said:Your comparison has negative correlation, as Janemba was obviously toying with Goku & Vegeta, unless you're implying SSJ2 Vegeta ~ SSJ3 Goku, even though it was indicated: Goku >> Vegeta in the movie.
SPC didn't do anything except he killed Trunks and nearly Vegeta. Broly on the other hand nearly destroy Goku, Gohan and Goten whether Goku was SSJ/2 is debatable.You're the one who was using their fight to determine their gap which i suggested you not to because of its inconsistency but later used it to prove that their gap is huge because of those tanking feats but then again, this is Toei.Spiral-Force said:The margin is significant, but again, Broly didn't do anything that SPC couldn't do, so I have no reason to put him above that level.
Also, perhaps you didn't notice, but your "feats don't mean anything in Toei world" argument is contradicted by you using Broly's/Gohan's FEATS to suggest how strong they are...
When did I ever disagree? You're the one that's using Broly's tanking feat to suggest a "wide" gap.Fearless Saiyajin said:So now you agree that it is inconsistency on Toei's part.
What was inconsistent in Janemba's case?Fearless Saiyajin said:It's not that he was toying, what i'm saying is that it is inconsistency so its baseless if you use it as your argument.
He also injured SSJ2 Kid Gohan's arm. Additionally, he is implied to rival SSJ2 Kid Gohan, and would've put up better resistance against the latter's full power Kamehameha if he wasn't caught off guard.Fearless Saiyajin said:SPC didn't do anything except he killed Trunks and nearly Vegeta.
It can be argued that Goku wasn't physically present during the beam struggle, but was merely giving mental support, like in Gohan's final beam struggle with Cell.Fearless Saiyajin said:Broly on the other hand nearly destroy Goku, Gohan and Goten whether Goku was SSJ/2 is debatable.
When did I say that the gap between Gohan & Broly is huge because of Broly's tanking feat? You're just needlessly and inaccurately overcomplicating things.Fearless Saiyajin said:You're the one who was using their fight to determine their gap which i suggested you not to because of its inconsistency but later used it to prove that their gap is huge because of those tanking feats but then again, this is Toei.
You claimed that Broly/Gohan gap is small because of their fight which I respond that its just inconsistent but if we use their fight to determine their gap then the gap would be big.Spiral-Force said:When did I ever disagree? You're the one that's using Broly's tanking feat to suggest a "wide" gap.
That Vegeta was able to put a good fight against him despite being a SSj2 tier while Janemba is a SSJ3 tier?Spiral-Force said:What was inconsistent in Janemba's case?
No argument with that.Spiral-Force said:He also injured SSJ2 Kid Gohan's arm. Additionally, he is implied to rival SSJ2 Kid Gohan, and would've put up better resistance against the latter's full power Kamehameha if he wasn't caught off guard.
That's debatale but its more likely that Goku was there given that he was shown to be there with his children unlike against Cell that was telephatic.Spiral-Force said:It can be argued that Goku wasn't actually present during the beam struggle, but was merely giving mental support like in Gohan's final beam struggle with Cell.
That was a mistake.Spiral-Force said:When did I say that the gap between Gohan & Broly is huge because of Broly's tanking feat? You're just needlessly and inaccurately overcomplicating things.